Home › Medical Malpractice › Surgical Errors
Surgical Errors Lawyer in Massachusetts
Surgical errors can cause devastating, permanent harm. Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey holds Massachusetts surgeons and hospitals accountable for operating room mistakes. Free consultation. No fees unless we win.
Surgical Errors as Medical Malpractice
Surgery is inherently a high-risk medical intervention, and not every complication of surgery constitutes malpractice. But when a complication results from a surgeon’s departure from the standard of surgical care, from improper technique, failure to identify and protect anatomical structures, failure to recognize and manage intraoperative complications, or failure to obtain informed consent, the resulting harm may be legally compensable. Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey represents surgical error victims throughout Massachusetts and evaluates every surgical outcome against the applicable surgical standard of care.
Common Surgical Errors
- Inadvertent injury to adjacent structures during the surgical procedure
- Failure to achieve adequate hemostasis resulting in significant intraoperative or postoperative bleeding
- Wrong-site, wrong-procedure, or wrong-patient surgery
- Retained surgical instruments: sponges, needles, or instruments left inside the patient
- Failure to recognize and respond appropriately to intraoperative complications
- Inadequate wound closure resulting in dehiscence or hernia
- Failure to convert from laparoscopic to open approach when indicated by developing complications
Informed Consent and Surgical Error
A surgeon must obtain the patient’s informed consent before performing surgery. This requires disclosing the nature of the procedure, its risks and benefits, the available alternatives, and what will happen if surgery is not performed. A patient who consents to a procedure without being informed of material risks that a reasonable patient would have considered important in their decision-making may have an informed consent claim independent of any surgical technique error. Attorney Lavey evaluates informed consent issues alongside technical surgical error analysis in every case.
Post-Operative Surgical Negligence
Surgical negligence does not end when the procedure concludes. Post-operative care failures, failure to monitor for complications, failure to recognize signs of infection or bleeding, delayed response to deteriorating vital signs in the recovery room, and failure to provide appropriate post-discharge instructions, can cause serious harm in the period following an otherwise properly performed procedure. Attorney Lavey evaluates the full perioperative course, before, during, and after surgery, in every surgical malpractice case.
Expert Surgical Testimony
Surgical malpractice cases require expert testimony from a surgeon in the relevant specialty who can address the standard of care for the specific procedure, identify the departure from that standard in the defendant’s technique or decisions, and explain how the departure caused the specific harm suffered. Attorney Lavey works with leading surgical specialists in every surgical malpractice case and ensures that the expert testimony is as specific and authoritative as the case requires.
Frequently Asked Questions
Some complications are known risks of procedures that can occur even with perfect surgical technique. The malpractice question is whether the complication resulted from a departure from the standard of care rather than from the inherent risks of the procedure. Expert surgical review of the operative record and the complication is the way to evaluate this question. Attorney Lavey has expert review performed in every potential surgical malpractice case.
Injury to adjacent blood vessels during surgery may be malpractice or may be a recognized risk of the specific procedure depending on the vessel involved, the difficulty of the case, and whether the injury resulted from recognizable departure from proper technique. Expert surgical testimony addresses whether the specific injury was within the range of acceptable surgical outcomes or represented a departure from the standard of care. Attorney Lavey evaluates vascular injuries in every applicable case.
If you were not told about a risk that occurred, and if you would have declined the surgery or chosen an alternative if you had known about it, an informed consent claim may be available independent of any technical surgical error. The informed consent claim requires expert testimony about the standard of disclosure and evidence that the undisclosed risk would have been material to a reasonable patient in your position. Attorney Lavey evaluates informed consent claims in every surgical malpractice case.
Massachusetts medical malpractice claims must generally be filed within the period established by state law from the date the patient knew or reasonably should have known of the harm caused by the malpractice. For surgical complications that are immediately apparent, the limitations period begins shortly after the surgery. For complications that take time to develop or to connect to the surgical procedure, the discovery rule may extend the limitations period. Attorney Lavey evaluates the applicable deadline at the outset of every surgical malpractice case.
Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey — Licensed Massachusetts Attorney
Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey is licensed to practice law in Massachusetts and has represented clients throughout Middlesex County and Massachusetts for over 37 years. He handles every case personally, no associates, no handoffs. Call (781) 938-1400 for a free consultation.
Book a Free Consultation Today
There Are No Fees Unless We Win.
- 1Complete our simple questionnaire
- 2Schedule a free consultation with Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey
