Home › Medical Malpractice › Retained Surgical Instrument
Retained Surgical Instrument Lawyer in Massachusetts
Retained surgical instruments and sponges are entirely preventable complications. Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey pursues full compensation for Massachusetts patients harmed by this never-event. Free consultation. No fees unless we win.
Retained Surgical Instruments as a Medical Never-Event
A retained surgical instrument, a sponge, towel, suture needle, retractor blade, or other item left inside a patient’s body at the conclusion of surgery, is classified as a never-event: a preventable error that should not occur when proper intraoperative counting protocols are followed. Retained foreign bodies cause serious complications including pain, internal organ damage, infection, abscess formation, and in severe cases, bowel obstruction and perforation. Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey represents patients harmed by retained surgical instruments throughout Massachusetts.
Counting Protocols and Their Required Implementation
The operating room team is required to count all surgical items, sponges, needles, instruments, before the procedure begins, after any significant phase of the surgery, and before wound closure. If the count does not reconcile, the protocol requires that the wound be inspected and additional measures taken to locate the missing item, including intraoperative imaging, before closure proceeds. A retained instrument that is discovered after the fact is strong evidence that the counting protocol was not properly followed or that a discrepancy was not properly resolved.
Harm Caused by Retained Instruments
The harm from a retained surgical instrument can range from chronic unexplained pain that persists for years before the object is identified to acute abscess, perforation, and life-threatening infection. A retained sponge may cause a slowly developing granuloma. A retained needle can migrate through tissue and cause injury in a remote location. The period between the surgery and the discovery of the retained instrument is itself a period of preventable harm during which the patient suffered effects attributable to the foreign body. All of this harm is compensable.
Who Is Liable for a Retained Surgical Instrument
The surgeon bears ultimate responsibility for ensuring that the operative field is clear before closure. The operating room nurse who conducted the count bears responsibility for count accuracy. The surgical technician who assists with counts shares responsibility. The hospital bears institutional liability for the counting protocol failures. Attorney Lavey pursues all responsible parties, surgeon, nursing staff, and hospital, in every retained instrument malpractice case.
Discovering a Retained Instrument After Surgery
Retained instruments are sometimes discovered on imaging studies performed for other reasons, or when a patient presents with symptoms, persistent pain, fever, bowel obstruction, that prompt evaluation. When a retained instrument is identified, it typically requires additional surgery for removal, with all the associated risks and recovery. Attorney Lavey advises patients who have discovered retained surgical instruments about their legal rights and manages the malpractice claim process from the initial evaluation through resolution.
Frequently Asked Questions
The Massachusetts medical malpractice statute of limitations typically begins to run when the patient knew or reasonably should have known of the injury caused by the malpractice. For retained instruments, this is typically when the instrument is discovered, not when the surgery was performed, because the patient may have had no way to know the instrument was present before discovery. Attorney Lavey evaluates the specific limitation period in every retained instrument case.
The discovery rule allows the limitations period to begin running when the retained instrument is discovered or when the patient knew or should have known of its presence. Instruments that are discovered years after surgery still support malpractice claims filed within the limitations period running from the discovery date. Attorney Lavey has handled retained instrument cases involving lengthy intervals between surgery and discovery.
Massachusetts malpractice law requires a Certificate of Merit confirming expert support for the claim. However, retained instrument cases often present a stronger factual basis than typical malpractice cases because the error, leaving an instrument inside the patient, is itself strong evidence of a departure from the counting protocol standard of care. Expert testimony on the counting protocol requirements and their breach is standard in these cases. Attorney Lavey manages the expert review and Certificate of Merit process in every retained instrument case.
Compensation covers the cost of additional surgery to remove the retained instrument, all medical treatment for complications caused by the retained instrument during the period it was present, all lost wages during additional treatment and recovery, pain and suffering for the entire period from the original surgery through removal, and future medical costs for any lasting consequences. Attorney Lavey pursues every element of compensation in every retained instrument case.
Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey — Licensed Massachusetts Attorney
Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey is licensed to practice law in Massachusetts and has represented clients throughout Middlesex County and Massachusetts for over 37 years. He handles every case personally, no associates, no handoffs. Call (781) 938-1400 for a free consultation.
Book a Free Consultation Today
There Are No Fees Unless We Win.
- 1Complete our simple questionnaire
- 2Schedule a free consultation with Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey
