Home › Medical Malpractice › Failure to Order Testing
Failure to Order Testing Lawyer in Massachusetts
When a physician fails to order necessary diagnostic testing, serious conditions go undetected. Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey holds Massachusetts physicians accountable for diagnostic testing failures. Free consultation. No fees unless we win.
Failure to Order Testing as Medical Malpractice
A physician who sees a patient with symptoms, risk factors, or clinical findings that should prompt diagnostic testing, but who fails to order that testing, may be departing from the standard of care. Diagnostic testing is the mechanism by which serious conditions are identified at stages when treatment is most effective. When a physician’s failure to order appropriate testing allows a condition to progress undetected, the resulting harm may be legally compensable as medical malpractice. Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey represents patients harmed by testing failures throughout Massachusetts.
Common Testing Failures That Cause Harm
- Failure to order cancer screening tests for patients with classic risk factors
- Failure to order an ECG for a patient presenting with chest pain, shortness of breath, or cardiac risk factors
- Failure to order a CT scan or MRI when neurological symptoms suggest stroke or intracranial pathology
- Failure to order a D-dimer or CT pulmonary angiogram for a patient with signs of pulmonary embolism
- Failure to order blood cultures for a febrile patient with signs of systemic infection
- Failure to order imaging for a patient with significant pain and mechanism of injury suggesting fracture
- Failure to biopsy a suspicious lesion that meets criteria for tissue sampling
The Standard of Care for Diagnostic Testing
The standard of care for diagnostic testing is determined by what a reasonably competent physician in the same specialty would have ordered given the specific clinical presentation. Evidence-based guidelines from specialty societies establish what testing is appropriate for particular presentations. When a physician departs from these guidelines without a documented clinical reason, and the departure allows a serious condition to go undetected, the departure may constitute malpractice. Attorney Lavey evaluates testing decisions against the applicable standard in every failure to order testing case.
The Harm From Testing Delays
When appropriate testing is not ordered, conditions progress untreated. Cancer advances through stages. Cardiac muscle dies. Infections reach sepsis. Blood clots fragment and cause pulmonary emboli. Each of these progressions causes harm that would not have occurred if the condition had been detected at the point when testing should have been ordered. The expert testimony in a failure to order testing case establishes both that the testing should have been ordered and what earlier detection would have meant for the patient’s outcome.
Compensation Available
Compensation in failure to order testing malpractice cases covers all additional treatment costs caused by the progression of the undetected condition during the period when testing should have been ordered, all lost wages during additional treatment, pain and suffering from the worsened condition, and future medical costs if the condition required more aggressive treatment than it would have needed with earlier detection. Attorney Lavey pursues every element of these damages in every failure to order testing case.
Frequently Asked Questions
Routine screening recommendations are part of the standard of care for patients who meet the relevant age, risk factor, and clinical criteria. A physician who fails to order recommended cancer screening tests, colonoscopy, mammogram, Pap smear, PSA, for patients who meet the screening criteria may be departing from the standard of care. The harm from a missed screening-detectable cancer is measured by the stage at which it is eventually detected compared to when it would have been caught with screening.
Ordering an inappropriate test, one that would not detect the suspected condition, is as problematic as ordering no test at all. If a physician orders a less sensitive or less specific test for a clinical presentation when a different test is the appropriate standard of care, and the condition goes undetected as a result, the failure to order the correct test may be malpractice. Attorney Lavey evaluates both the appropriateness of testing decisions and the appropriateness of test selection.
A physician who refuses a patient’s request for a diagnostic test when that request was clinically appropriate bears responsibility for the decision not to test. The fact that the patient requested the test is relevant evidence of the physician’s awareness that the patient had concerns about the condition that the test would have evaluated. Attorney Lavey evaluates refused testing requests as potential malpractice in appropriate cases.
If the test was ordered and performed but the results were lost or not transmitted to the ordering physician, the failure to follow up on test results is a systems failure for which the healthcare organization may bear liability alongside the ordering physician. Attorney Lavey investigates the systems failure in testing follow-up cases as well as the decision to order testing in the first place.
Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey — Licensed Massachusetts Attorney
Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey is licensed to practice law in Massachusetts and has represented clients throughout Middlesex County and Massachusetts for over 37 years. He handles every case personally, no associates, no handoffs. Call (781) 938-1400 for a free consultation.
Book a Free Consultation Today
There Are No Fees Unless We Win.
- 1Complete our simple questionnaire
- 2Schedule a free consultation with Attorney Jeffrey C. Lavey
